By HELENE
COOPER and MARK LANDLERAUG. 26, 2014
The New York Times
WASHINGTON
— The United States has begun to mobilize a broad coalition of allies behind
potential American military action in Syria and is moving toward expanded
airstrikes in northern Iraq, administration officials said on Tuesday.
President
Obama, the officials said, was broadening his campaign against the Sunni
militants of the Islamic State in Iraq
and Syria and nearing a
decision to authorize airstrikes and airdrops of food and water around the
northern Iraqi town of Amerli , home to members
of Iraq ’s
Turkmen minority. The town of 12,000 has been under siege for more than two
months by the militants.
“Rooting
out a cancer like ISIL won’t be easy, and it won’t be quick,” Mr. Obama said in
a speech on Tuesday to the American Legion in Charlotte ,
N.C. , using an alternative name for ISIS . He said that the United States was building a
coalition to “take the fight to these barbaric terrorists,” and that the
militants would be “no match” for a united international community.
Administration
officials characterized the dangers facing the Turkmen, who are Shiite Muslims
considered infidels by ISIS, as similar to the threat faced by thousands of Yazidis,
who were driven to Mount Sinjar in Iraq after attacks by the
militants. The United Nations special representative for Iraq , Nickolay Mladenov, said in a
statement three days ago that the situation in Amerli “demands immediate action
to prevent the possible massacre of its citizens.”
As Mr.
Obama considered new strikes, the White House began its diplomatic campaign to
enlist allies and neighbors in the region to increase their support for Syria ’s
moderate opposition and, in some cases, to provide support for possible
American military operations. The countries likely to be enlisted include Australia , Britain ,
Jordan , Qatar , Saudi
Arabia , Turkey
and the United Arab Emirates ,
officials said.
The
officials, who asked not to be named discussing sensitive internal
deliberations, said they expected that Britain
and Australia would be
willing to join the United
States in an air campaign. The officials
said they also wanted help from Turkey ,
which has military bases that could be used to support an effort in Syria .
On Monday
the Pentagon began surveillance flights over Syria
in an effort to collect information on possible ISIS
targets as a precursor to airstrikes, a senior official said. The Syrian
Observatory for Human Rights, an organization that monitors the humanitarian
consequences of the conflict in Syria ,
reported that “non-Syrian spy planes” on Monday carried out surveillance of
ISIS positions in the eastern province
of Deir Ezzor . Although America ’s allies in the region have plenty of
reasons to support an intensified effort against ISIS, analysts said, the United States will
have to navigate tensions among them.
“One of the
problems is that different countries have different clients among the fighting
groups in Syria ,” said
Robert S. Ford, a former American ambassador to Syria . “To get them all to work
together, the best thing would be for them to pick one client and funnel all
the funds through that client. You’ve got to pick one command structure.”
But
persuading counties to help the United States
in a military campaign in Syria
will require more effort, administration officials said. Turkey , for example, is in the
midst of a political transition, with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
ascending to the presidency.
His likely
successor as prime minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, has been deeply immersed in Syria as
foreign minister. The White House, meanwhile, has been unable to win Senate
confirmation of a new ambassador to Turkey , John Bass, leaving the post
vacant at a critical time.
Enlisting
the Sunni neighbors of Syria
is crucial, experts said, because airstrikes alone will not be enough to push
back ISIS . The administration, Mr. Ford said,
needs to pursue a sequential strategy that begins with gathering intelligence,
followed by targeted airstrikes, more robust and better coordinated support for
the moderate rebels, and finally, a political reconciliation process similar to
that underway in Iraq .
The White
House is also debating how to satisfy a second constituency, Congress. Mr.
Obama’s advisers are considering whether to seek congressional authorization
for expanded military action and if so, under what legal rationale. Lawmakers
had been reluctant to vote on airstrikes in Iraq , but several have begun
arguing that the broader action being contemplated by Mr. Obama would demand a
vote in Congress.
“I do not
believe that our expanded military operations against ISIL are covered under
existing authorizations from Congress,” said Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, a
Democratic member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Senator Bob
Corker, the Tennessee Republican who is the ranking member of the Foreign
Relations Committee, said on MSNBC that Congress needed to “own” any further
military action against the militants.
On Tuesday,
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said in a statement that seven Western countries
had pledged to provide weapons and ammunition to Kurdish forces who are
fighting ISIS in northern Iraq .
Rear Adm.
John Kirby, the Pentagon press secretary, said Albania
and Britain
had started moving supplies to the Kurds.
No comments:
Post a Comment