BY GABRIEL WILDAU
SHANGHAI Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:17am EST
(Reuters) -
The price gap between bitcoins trading in Chinese yuan and those sold for other
currencies has evaporated in recent days, highlighting the porous nature of China 's capital
controls.
Chinese
bitcoin chat rooms buzzed last month as investors noticed that the digital
currency as sold on China 's
biggest exchange was more expensive, in dollar terms, than bitcoins traded
abroad using dollars, creating a tempting arbitrage play.
Traders
could earn profits by buying bitcoins using dollars on a foreign exchange such
as Mt. Gox , reselling them for yuan at the
higher price on BTC China, the main local exchange, and finally converting the
yuan back to dollars.
"Insane
bitcoin. If you've got dollars, hurry and do arbitrage," a user called
'foxtree' wrote on Weibo, a Twitter-like micro-blogging platform, on November
19, the day the gap peaked at more than 30 percent.
A key
driver of the price gap was China 's
capital controls, which make it difficult for speculators to swap yuan proceeds
from the sale of high-priced Chinese bitcoins into dollars.
"Certainly
a portion of the premium on BTC China was a result of the fact that any coins
sold would be in RMB, which isn't the most portable currency," said Zennon
Kapron, head of Kapronasia, a Hong Kong-based finance and technology
consultancy, using an alternate term for the Chinese currency.
"So if
you did trade that market, getting your money back into another currency is
more difficult," he said.
RAPID
EVOLUTION
In recent
days, however, the spread between bitcoins as priced in yuan and those priced
in dollars has disappeared. An announcement by China's central bank last week
forbidding commercial banks from dealing in bitcoin also contributed to the
price decline on BTC China.
But
analysts say the price convergence also reflects the rapid evolution of the
bitcoin market, which began with technology enthusiasts but quickly expanded to
include those with the financial know-how to evade China's strict capital
controls.
A
27-year-old e-commerce professional from the east coast city of Xiamen, who
goes by the screen name 'King,' is typical of early-wave amateur punters.
He told
Reuters that he used RChange, an online currency exchange and payment service
based in the Seychelles, to exchange yuan for commercially-operated electronic
currencies such as OKPay and EgoPay, which are accepted by several
international bitcoin exchanges. But because such currencies carry hefty
charges, this method is only profitable when the bitcoin spread is very wide.
SOPHISTICATED
ARBITRAGEURS
Recently,
as bitcoin has grown in popularity, more sophisticated arbitrageurs have
stepped in. Early this month, Chinese media began reporting that investors from
Wenzhou, the east coastal city known for its entrepreneurial and speculative
zeal, were piling into bitcoin.
Wenzhou's
famously tight-knit, business-savvy global diaspora has given rise to the adage
"Wherever there's a market, there are Wenzhou people" and offers
Wenzhou investors ready access to foreign currency.
Some
bitcoin speculators are also likely resorting to other tried-and-true methods
for skirting China's capital controls. The most common is falsified trade
invoices, which disguise movements of speculative cash as payments for goods
and services.
Indeed,
unexpectedly strong export growth in November reignited suspicions that
official data had been inflated by fake invoicing.
Those
suspicions centered on the conversion of dollars to yuan in order to profit
from appreciation of the Chinese currency. But the same technique has been used
to move funds in the other direction.
Mis-invoicing
in China resulted in illicit outflows worth $3.79 trillion between 2000 and
2011, according to a report last year by Global Financial Integrity, a think
tank and advocacy group in Washington.
A
Shanghai-based fixed income fund manager dismissed capital controls as a
barrier to shifting money around. "All of my clients have plenty of money
offshore already," he said.
(Additional
reporting by Shanghai newsroom; Editing by Richard Borsuk)
No comments:
Post a Comment