The
Guardian
Spencer
Ackerman in New York
The Pentagon
warned on Tuesday that Islamic State (Isis) militants have global aspirations,
ratcheting up already dire US
rhetoric against the jihadist army that has overrun much of Iraq and Syria .
“Quite
frankly, we’re not turning a blind eye to their global aspirations as well,”
said Rear Admiral John Kirby, the Pentagon press secretary.
Isis has
not conducted attacks outside of Iraq
– its gestation ground – and Syria ,
where its successes brought it global attention. Its own rhetoric imagines a
global Islamic caliphate, obliterating man-made borders, but its capabilities –
which include access to oil wealth – fall significantly short.
Yet Isis’s
attraction of as many as thousands of western passport holders has convinced US intelligence that Isis fighters will plot
attacks against the US and Europe .
“Much has
been made about the threat they pose, and how imminent it is, and you don’t
need to look any further than the recruitment of foreign fighters and the
degree to which not just the United States government but many western
governments are concerned about these foreign fighters leaving their shores,
going over there, getting radicalized, trained, and then coming back and
executing attacks, which is not out of the realm of the possible,” Kirby told
reporters.
As Nato’s
secretary general also indicated an openness of the transatlantic alliance to
take military action against Isis, US defense secretary Chuck Hagel hailed the
UK, France, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Italy and Albania for arming the Kurdish
peshmerga, and said he expected other nations to contribute.
“The
determination of the Iraqi people and the international community to counter
the threat posed by [Isis ] is only growing,”
Hagel said on Tuesday.
Hagel,
joined by General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff who
has long been skeptical of US
intervention in Syria ’s
civil war, on Thursday described Isis in
apocalyptic terms. The two Pentagon leaders called Isis an “imminent threat to
every interest we have” and said defeating the group would likely require
strikes into Syria .
Yet neither
has endorsed taking such action, and Dempsey has since drawn a line short of
saying Isis threatens the US homeland, a step he considers necessary for
expanding what has thus far been a limited, if inchoate, war.
One of the
reasons Dempsey has cited for his wariness is the threat Syria ’s air
defenses could pose to US pilots. Kirby said Tuesday the Pentagon’s assessment
of their robustness has not changed.
In contrast
to Dempsey’s reluctance, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Nato secretary-general, said
that the alliance would be willing to consider a request from the Iraqi
government to get involved.
“Nato has a
partnership with Iraq
and if there is a request for further enhancement of that partnership, I think
Nato allies would consider such a request constructively,” Rasmussen told the
BBC on Tuesday.
A Nato
spokeswoman, Oana Lungescu, said that any alliance involvement remained
hypothetical, as Iraq
has not requested Nato’s help. She noted that Nato members “can of course raise
any issues they see fit” at the alliance’s summit in Cardiff next week.
Kirby would
not address reported US
surveillance flights over Syria .
But he emphatically denied any cooperation with Syrian dictator Bashar
al-Assad, against whom the US
nearly went to war last year.
“We are not
coordinating with the Assad regime on the operations that we’re conducting in Iraq or any efforts to combat [Isis ],”
Kirby said.
No comments:
Post a Comment