Local
Governments Have Borrowed a Pile of Money in Recent Years, Leaving Even Beijing Wondering How
Much
By SHEN
HONG
Updated
Oct. 20, 2013 9:36 p.m. ET
Estimates
vary so widely they are almost meaningless. Government officials, analysts and
economists have offered numbers that range from 15 trillion yuan to 30 trillion
yuan ($2.46 trillion to $4.92 trillion), which equals nearly 30% to 60% of
gross domestic product.
"The
most scary thing is that even the central government doesn't really know how
large the size of the local government debt is," said Hu Yifan, economist
at Chinese brokerage firm Haitong International.
The size of
the debt and the uncertainty about how much is out there also underscore a
major risk facing the Chinese financial system: how little control the central
government has over borrowing by cities and towns.
"Local
government debt has been growing at a speed of nearly 20% a year in the last
couple of years. If this trend continues, it will definitely bring about
systemic risks for China 's
economy," said Nomura economist Zhiwei Zhang.
The numbers
matter a lot to Beijing .
Analysts say it could be on the hook for a significant portion of that debt if
it goes bad, and yields on many of the bonds reflect the expectation that the
central government would back the bonds. If the debt is backed by Beijing , they argue, it should be considered part of China 's
national debt, pushing that total to a worrisome 200% of GDP, up from 129% at
the end of 2008, according to Fitch Ratings. The U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio is 82%,
according to the World Bank, not including state and local debt.
Another
worry is who would lose if some of that debt went bad. According to Standard
& Poor's, 80% of local government bonds are owned by Chinese investment
firms, which manage money for individuals and insurance companies, and some of
the bonds have ended up in wealth-management products sold by banks to
individuals. Foreign investors have negligible access to the bond market at the
moment.
A 1.5
billion yuan ($246 million) bond issued last month by a small, poor region
called the Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture
illustrates Beijing 's
dilemma. Located in a mountainous area of Guizhou
province in southwestern China ,
Qiannan is known for phosphorite, black sticky rice and delicious quail.
The money
from the bonds is set to fund the construction of roads, bridges and tunnels,
but the prefecture couldn't come close to making the payments without getting
big cash subsidies from higher-level governments. Even though the subsidies
aren't guaranteed, the prefecture is paying a 6.9% yield on the seven-year
bonds, far lower than all but the biggest Chinese companies pay.
The
regional government itself didn't actually issue these bonds, because of
long-standing rules that prohibit local governments from running deficits or
borrowing. Instead, such governments create companies called local government
financing vehicles to get around the restrictions, one way that borrowers are
skirting the will of Beijing 's
regulators. New bonds issued by these entities rose last year to 1.09 trillion
yuan from 400 billion yuan a year earlier, according to data provider WIND
Info.
In this
case, the prefecture used a company called Qiannan Prefecture State Capital
Operating Co. to issue the debt. The company, which is one of thousands of
local government financing vehicles in China, builds infrastructure for the
prefecture but doesn't make much money in that business. Last year, it
generated enough cash to cover just half of its debt payments. To make up the
shortfall, it relies on subsidies from the prefecture, which itself relies on
subsidies from higher-level governments to pay its bills. Investors in the
bonds are effectively relying on two sets of subsidies, neither of which is
guaranteed, to get their interest payments.
An official
from the company, who declined to reveal her name, told The Wall Street
Journal, "We issued the bond on behalf of the government. Please direct
any questions to them." Officials at the Qiannan government's Finance
Department couldn't be reached for comment.
In a survey
of 36 local governments released in June, China 's state auditor said that
among the 223 financing vehicles run by these governments, 151 of them failed
to generate enough revenue to cover their annual debt repayment. "Because
of their inadequate repayment ability, some provincial capitals had to borrow
new debt to pay for their old debt," the state auditor said.
Analysts
raise several concerns. First, they argue that because local government debt will
likely be backed by Beijing it should be
considered part of China 's
national debt. Local bond-rating agencies routinely give these bonds high
ratings because of the expected central government backing. So far, there
haven't been any defaults by local government financing vehicles.
Second,
because much of this debt is backed by land owned by the local governments, a
decline in land prices could wipe out some of the collateral on the bonds.
"Since
many local governments use land as collateral for their debt, a potential fall
in China 's
property market will pose huge risks to them," said Terry Gao, a senior
analyst at Fitch Ratings.
That puts Beijing in a difficult
situation. If it continues to try to push down property prices, which have been
climbing rapidly, it risks leaving itself saddled with more bad debt from local
governments.
In Qiannan Prefecture , income from land sales fell
by more than 40% in each of the past two years, according to a report by
Chinese bond-rating firm Pengyuan Credit Rating Co., citing data it obtained
from the local government.
The last
big concern is that governments spent the proceeds of the bonds on unnecessary
projects that are unlikely to boost local growth, which would make it harder to
pay off the bonds.
Beijing has
sent a number of inspection teams around the country to tally the outstanding
debt, and the results of the survey, which is widely expected to be released
late this month or early next month, will likely serve as a key factor in new
economic policies to be unveiled at the next Communist Party meeting in
November.
Local
government financing vehicles don't rely completely on the bond market to raise
money. They have borrowed 9.59 trillion yuan ($1.57 trillion) from banks
through the first quarter of this year, according to the latest data available
from China 's
banking regulator and state auditor.
Regulators
slowed the pace of that lending, which led the borrowers to turn to bonds and,
more recently, to China's so-called shadow banking system, where they have
borrowed an estimated 2.39 trillion yuan through the end of the second quarter,
more than double the amount from a year earlier. Shadow banking consists of
wealth-management products and other products sold to investors, often arranged
by banks but not included on their balance sheets.
Write to
Shen Hong at hong.shen@dowjones.com
No comments:
Post a Comment