November
11, 2013
By NIKOS
KONSTANDARAS
The New
York Times
The
brutality of the crime would be shocking anywhere: the gunman walked up to
three young men, all members of Golden Dawn, on a busy neighborhood sidewalk
and fired 12 bullets in seven seconds, finishing off two victims with bullets
to the head and leaving the third seriously wounded before escaping on a
motorcycle driven by an accomplice.
It is hard
to imagine many other countries — especially mature Western democracies — where
the murder of two rank-and-file members of a relatively small political party
could raise serious fears of political instability and national division. Yet
this is how precarious things have become in Greece , as the country labors
through its sixth year of recession and the third year of an economic recovery
program that is long on austerity and short on growth. Political and social
tensions feed off current misery and draw on deep historical roots of division.
“This is
like lighting a match in a powder magazine, especially when there are so many
other fires burning in the economy,” Prime Minister Antonis Samaras said after
the Nov. 1 killings.
He is
trying to keep Greece
on track to meet commitments to the country’s creditors while dealing with a
political system so fragmented and confrontational that it seems to be wired
for conflict. Mr. Samaras heads a coalition of his center-right New Democracy
and the center-left Pasok.
The main
opposition party — the leftist Syriza — rose from the fringes to become the
second largest party last year; the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn, which used to have
but a few thousand supporters, gained enough votes to take 18 seats in the
300-member Parliament and become a disturbing presence in politics and society.
The crisis,
and the measures aimed at combating it, have resulted in high unemployment (28
percent), a steep drop in gross domestic product (28 percent from 2008), higher
taxes, lower incomes, fewer benefits, widespread insecurity and a loss of faith
in the political system, democratic institutions and even in the European
Union.
The
opposition parties have gained support with promises that they will restore all
that has been lost during the years of austerity and reform. Elections for the
European Parliament and for local authorities in May could see them making more
gains, perhaps making the government’s position untenable. That could force
early national elections that, if recent polls are confirmed, would result in a
further strengthening of Syriza and Golden Dawn, and a deadlock leading to more
fragmentation, division and instability.
Political
intrigue, violence and division were staples of Greek history until the
country’s accession to what is now the European Union in 1981. The monarchy,
the military, foreign powers and the realities of the Cold War all played a
role in stoking those fires, but they were also able to end them when they
chose to. The monarchy was abolished by referendum in 1974 after the collapse
of the right-wing military dictatorship, and the military has been defanged by
decades of European Union membership. The end of the Cold War was followed by
European Union and NATO expansion into Greece ’s neighborhood, meaning that
the country was no longer an exception in the region. Foreign powers have more
pressing concerns than Greece ’s
well-being. It is up to the Greeks and their institutions to safeguard
stability.
This is why
the murders are significant. Golden Dawn has been a destabilizing force in Greece ’s
politics and society since its sudden rise in the polls last year. Its members
were increasingly belligerent — in Parliament and in the streets, where they
carried out attacks (some of them lethal) on immigrants and political
opponents. They appeared to be acting with impunity because neither the
government, nor the police, nor the judiciary seemed willing to act against
them — until Sept. 18, when the anti-fascist rapper Pavlos Fyssas was murdered
by a Golden Dawn member. (He confessed to the crime.)
The
authorities came down hard. Golden Dawn’s leader, his deputy and other members
are now either in prison or free on bail awaiting trial on charges of running a
criminal organization; the party’s state funding has been suspended and its
police protection revoked.
The
country’s democratic institutions were reasserting themselves. Now they have to
prove themselves quickly and find the culprits in the Nov. 1 attack. The police
suspect that it was carried out by extreme-left-wing terrorists, successors of
the “November 17” gang that murdered 23 people between 1975 and 2002, when the
police finally broke it up. The group (espousing a mix of Marxism and violent
nationalism, as if this were not a contradiction in terms) depicted itself as
an avenging angel of the underdog left, selecting targets from the business,
political and police establishment, as well as military and diplomatic
representatives of the United States and Britain, whom they blamed for helping
a right-wing government defeat Communist guerrillas in the civil war of
1946-49, which followed the Nazi occupation.
Supporters
of Golden Dawn, who see themselves as underdogs and nationalists, have long
chafed at leftist domination of the public debate and the leftist sense of
victimization. The murder of two Golden Dawn members has suddenly given its
supporters the moral high ground and heightened their sense of injustice. That
could translate into an even stronger showing in the polls. Worse, it might
prompt revenge killings by what is, after all, a professed paramilitary
organization.
With forces
of the political left and right gaining strength and perhaps headed for a
conflict, with the center struggling to hold, we might see what seemed
impossible until recently: a new round of civil strife after decades of peace
and progress. Though a descent into political violence is not imminent, the
scene is set in a way that depends too much on what fools with guns will choose
to do.
Nikos
Konstandaras is the managing editor and a columnist at the newspaper
Kathimerini.
INTERNATIONAL NEW YORK TIMES.
No comments:
Post a Comment