The
Economist
Nov 30th
2013
It looks
overvalued. But even if this digital currency crashes, others will follow
BITCOIN is
booming. Investors are piling into the digital currency, which is not issued by
a central bank but is conjured into being by cryptographic software running on
a network of volunteers’ computers. This week the price of a Bitcoin soared to
above $1,000, from less than $15 in January.
Having long
been favoured by libertarians, gold bugs and drug dealers, Bitcoin is attracting
some surprising new fans. Germany
has recognised it as a “unit of account”. Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal
Reserve, told a Senate committee on virtual currencies that the idea “may hold
long-term promise”. A small but growing band of shops and firms accept payments
in Bitcoin. Some like the way it allows funds to be transferred directly
between users, without middlemen. Others are attracted by the potential for
anonymous transfers, or by the fact that the number of Bitcoins in circulation
has a fixed upper limit—so there is no way a central bank can inflate their
value away by issuing more.
But the
recent price surge, driven by Chinese investors stashing money offshore, looks
like a classic bubble. Hoarding means that Bitcoin is currently more of a
speculative asset than a currency. And a crash is not the only risk Bitcoin
users face. As the price rises, Bitcoin theft is increasing, both from
individuals and from online exchanges that store the coins and convert them
into other currencies. Around $1m in Bitcoins was recently stolen from BIPS, a
European exchange. GBL, a Chinese Bitcoin exchange, abruptly vanished in
October, taking $4.1m-worth of deposits with it.
The system
itself is straining at the seams (see Technology Quarterly). The amount of
computing power consumed by its transaction-verification system, which has the
side-effect of “mining” new Bitcoins, is mushrooming: it now far exceeds that
of the world’s 500 fastest supercomputers combined. At the same time Bitcoin’s
method of recording and processing transactions, and compensating those who
verify them, is becoming unwieldy. Adjusting Bitcoin’s protocols, however,
requires getting the volunteers who maintain its software to agree on the
necessary changes, and the Bitcoin community to adopt them, before anything
goes wrong.
Excitement
about Bitcoin, and concerns about its limitations, have prompted the emergence
of many other cryptocurrencies, or altcoins. Litecoin, for example, retains
Bitcoin’s limited money supply but offers faster transactions and is intended
to prevent a computational arms-race among miners. And whereas Bitcoin was
created by a mysterious figure known as Satoshi Nakamoto, who vanished in 2010,
Litecoin’s creator, Charles Lee, makes no secret of his identity. Peercoin has
no money-supply limit, built-in inflation of 1% and a more energy-efficient
mining process, though, as with Bitcoin, its creator is unknown. Anoncoin and
Zerocoin, meanwhile, strive for complete anonymity—which Bitcoin lacks. And so
on.
We’ve heard
this song before
Bitcoin,
then, is merely the first and, for the time being, the best-known example in a
new category. In many ways it is akin to Napster, the pioneering file-sharing
service that upended the music industry in 1999 by allowing internet users to
call up almost any song at will. Though Napster, unlike Bitcoin, was illegal,
it demonstrated that there was enormous demand for what it provided, prompting
many other services to spring up in its wake. Just as Napster paved the way for
BitTorrent, iTunes and Spotify, Bitcoin has triggered a surge of innovation in
digital money.
So let a
thousand altcoins bloom. In the meantime, if you are lucky or clever enough to
have owned an asset whose price has risen 60-fold in a year, it might be time
to sell.
Correction:
This article originally stated that Litecoin was intended to be more
energy-efficient than Bitcoin. In fact, its design strives to prevent a
computational arms-race among miners by reducing the benefits associated with
specialised mining hardware; Peercoin is designed to allow more
energy-efficient mining. This was corrected on November 29th.
Usually I don't read article on blogs, but I would like
ReplyDeleteto say that this write-up very forced me to take a look at and do it!
Your writing style has been amazed me. Thanks, quite great article.
My blog post - Thebuigallery.com
Ahaa, its pleasant dialogue regarding this piece of writing here at this web site, I have read all that, so now me also commenting at this place.
ReplyDeleteFeel free to visit my web page ... buy litecoin with paypal instant