June 14,
2013
By THE
EDITORIAL BOARD
The New
York Times
The
International Monetary Fund now has a chance to show what it has learned from
past policy mistakes on Greece ,
mistakes it acknowledged last week. This week a delegation from the fund, the
European Central Bank and the European Commission was in Athens to review Greek compliance with the
terms of the latest bailout agreement, a condition for releasing this month’s
$4 billion installment. Greek officials said they hoped the European examiners
would show new flexibility on changing the agreement’s more counterproductive
requirements.
Adjustments
are most needed on tourism taxes and privatization deadlines. Foreign tourism
is one of the few bright spots in the Greek economy, with as many as 17 million
foreign tourists expected this year. Athens
wants to attract more tourist spending by lowering the value-added tax on
restaurants and tavernas from the current 23 percent to a more tolerable 13
percent. This means fewer tax dollars in the short term for the Greek
government, but more jobs and revenues for the struggling private sector. The
three official lenders should agree to this.
And while
the trio’s insistence that Athens
sell off mismanaged state enterprises and real estate is sound, the rate of
sales to the private sector depends on the willingness of qualified buyers to
pay fair market prices.
That
process hit a big snag this week when the only expected bidder for Greece ’s natural gas monopoly, a subsidiary of Russia ’s
Gazprom, unexpectedly withdrew. The reasons are disputed, but Greek officials
say European Union misgivings about Gazprom’s extending its stranglehold over
the union’s natural gas market was a factor.
Gazprom’s
withdrawal cost Athens
more than $1 billion in expected privatization revenues. Under the terms of the
current bailout agreement, devastating new government spending cuts must now
replace 50 percent of those lost revenues. That provision should be suspended
until new sales terms can be worked out.
The
stubborn insistence of European officials that nothing is wrong with this
picture probably means these officials will not respond constructively to Athens ’s reasonable
requests for relief. But the I.M.F., having expressed some regret for past
error, should see more clearly the harm being done.
Meet The
New York Times’s Editorial Board ».
No comments:
Post a Comment