By Jeff
Black - Mar 26, 2013 3:42 PM GMT+0200
Mario
Draghi’s brinkmanship has worked -- for now.
The
European Central Bank’s ultimatum to Cyprus to commit to a 10
billion-euro ($12.9 billion) rescue showed Draghi playing a harder and more
public game than in any bailout before. While that’s easy enough with a country
like Cyprus ,
officials may shirk from such tactics with bigger nations, said economists from
Citigroup Inc. to ABN Amro Bank NV.
“The ECB does
want to lay down the law and pressure countries into doing what the
international lenders expect of them,” said Nick Kounis, head of macro research
at ABN Amro in Amsterdam .
“That said, playing chicken with Cyprus
is a lot easier than doing it with Spain
or Italy .”
President
Draghi drew a line in the sand for Cyprus by defining what it needed
to do to keep its banks afloat and, effectively, stay in the euro. The choice
of being just as tough or more flexible may present itself again if political
instability in Italy or the
struggle to curb deficits in Spain
test the financial-market lull that has prevailed since last year.
The Cyprus episode reveals the extent of the Frankfurt- based ECB’s leverage in bailouts. As finance
ministers haggle over adjustment plans and bank rescues, the ECB controls the
so- called Emergency Liquidity Assistance that can keep financial systems
afloat. Cyprus ’s
ELA lending stands at about 10 billion euros, equal to about 56 percent of
annual output.
Liquidity
Aid
Liquidity
assistance is formally the responsibility of national central banks and must be
guaranteed by governments rather the 17 euro-area central banks. The ECB’s
Governing Council can object if that lending becomes too large or appears to
prop up banks with no hope of becoming liquid or staying solvent.
Yesterday,
the ECB used that power to renew its life support for Cyprus after
the country succumbed to creditors’ demands to shrink its banking system in
exchange for aid. That followed a week of political brinkmanship between Nicosia on one side and
euro policy makers on the other.
As German
Chancellor Angela Merkel expressed her irritation with Cyprus , the ECB played its part by delivering Cyprus an
ultimatum on March 21 that gave it four days to come up with a deal acceptable
to the European Union and the International Monetary Fund. Otherwise the ECB
would cut off funds to its banks.
More
Flexible
“In the
end, the ECB made it clear the capitulation had to be on the other side,” said
Ken Wattret, chief European economist at BNP Paribas SA in London . “It certainly raised the stakes, but
it also galvanized the politicians into action.”
What to the
outside looked like the ECB hurrying up a necessary process actually
represented European bullying of a small country, according to Christopher
Pissarides, a Nobel laureate and head of Cyprus’s economic policy council.
“The
behavior of the Eurogroup wasn’t one that would give you the impression, if not
convince you, that here was a single unit of 17 partners trying to do the best for
their continent and their currency,” he said in an interview with Bloomberg
Television yesterday. “It was more like: here is a little guy who has
misbehaved, and we’ll put him down.”
Throwing
down ultimatums has proved to be an effective, if high-risk, strategy elsewhere
in the euro crisis. On Oct. 31, 2011, then-Greek Prime Minister George
Papandreou roiled the euro’s leaders by declaring he was planning to hold a
referendum on the latest bailout package facing his nation.
No Repeat
Fearing
weeks of turmoil, Merkel and then-French President Nicolas Sarkozy raised the
stakes by saying that any plebiscite should be an in-out vote on Greece ’s euro
membership. Within three days, Papandreou had backed down.
The Cyprus
approach isn’t likely to be replicated if a country like Spain, the
fourth-largest euro economy, needs to tap a bailout and apply for use of the
ECB’s Outright Monetary Transactions bond-buying program, said Juergen Michels,
chief euro-area economist at Citigroup in London. Spanish Prime Minister
Mariano Rajoy is struggling to curb a deficit worsened by the cost of servicing
the nation’s swelling debt load.
“I’m not so
sure the ECB would act in the same way as it did in Cyprus ,” Michels said. “They have
to make sure that the whole system works, so there’s always an element of
doubt” that they’ll insist on the rules.
Populist
Leaders
While
Draghi and ECB officials like Joerg Asmussen, who took the lead in Cypriot
negotiations, have consistently emphasized the “strict conditionality” of the
as-yet-untested OMT program, the central bank will have to be more flexible if
such a scenario arises, Michels said.
The ECB
faces a similar quandary with the prospect of a populist or euro-skeptic
leadership in Italy .
Inconclusive elections on Feb. 25 prompted the biggest bond-market slide in 14
months and may result in former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi becoming the
kingmaker of a new government.
An opponent
of austerity, Berlusconi could calculate that the ECB wouldn’t be able to turn
its back on a country as big as Italy .
That could still pile pressure on the ECB to soften its conditions for
bond-market aid to stop contagion spreading throughout the euro area, said
Richard Barwell, senior European economist at Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc
(RBS) in London .
“It has
been politically useful for the ECB to be seen to have meant it when it
threatened Cyprus ,”
Barwell said. “In game theory, only the credible threat counts. Without that,
they’d have zero plausibility when it came to Spain
or Italy .”
To contact
the reporter on this story: Jeff Black in Frankfurt
at jblack25@bloomberg.net
To contact
the editor responsible for this story: Craig Stirling at
cstirling1@bloomberg.net
No comments:
Post a Comment