JUN 11,
2015 21
By Anatole
Kaletsky
Project
Syndicate
To judge by
Tsipras’s belligerence, he firmly believes that Europe needs Greece as desperately as Greece needs Europe .
This is the true “absurdity” in the present negotiations, and Tsipras’
misapprehension of his bargaining power now risks catastrophe for his country,
humiliation for his Syriza party, or both.
The most
likely outcome is that Tsipras will eat his words and submit to the conditions
set by the “troika” (the European Commission, European Central Bank, and the
International Monetary Fund) before the end of June. If not, the ECB will stop
supporting the Greek banking system, and the government will run out of money
to service foreign debts and, more dramatically, to pay Greek citizens their
pensions and wages. Cut off from all external finance, Greece will
become an economic pariah – the Argentina of Europe – and public pressure will
presumably oust Syriza from power.
This
outcome is all the more tragic, given that the economic analysis underlying
Syriza’s demand for an easing of austerity was broadly right. Instead of
seeking a face-saving compromise on softening the troika program, Tsipras
wasted six months on symbolic battles over economically irrelevant issues such
as labor laws, privatizations, even the name of the troika.
This
provocative behavior lost Greece
all potential allies in France
and Italy .
Worse still, the time wasted on political grandstanding destroyed the primary
budget surplus, which was Tsipras’s trump card in the early negotiations.
Now Tsipras
thinks he holds another trump card: Europe ’s
fear of a Greek default. But this is a delusion promoted by his finance
minister, Yanis Varoufakis. A professor of game theory, Varoufakis recently
boasted to the New York Times that “little Greece , in
order to survive, [could] bring down the financial world,” and that his media
image “as an irrational fool… is doing my work for me” by frightening other EU
finance ministers.
Apparently,
Varoufakis believes that his “sophisticated grasp of game theory” gives Greece a
crucial advantage in “the complicated dynamics” of the negotiations. In fact,
the game being played out in Europe is less
like chess than like tic-tac-toe, where a draw is the normal outcome, but a
wrong move means certain defeat.
The rules
of this game are much simpler than Varoufakis expected because of a momentous
event that occurred in the same week as the Greek election. On January 22, the
ECB took decisive action to protect the eurozone from a possible Greek default.
By announcing a huge program of bond purchases, much bigger relative to the
eurozone bond market than the quantitative easing implemented in the United States , Britain ,
or Japan , ECB President
Mario Draghi erected the impenetrable firewall that had long been needed to
protect the monetary Union from a Lehman-style
financial meltdown.
The ECB’s
newfound ability to print money, essentially without limit, to support both
banks and governments has reduced Greek contagion to insignificance. That
represents a profound change in Europe ’s
financial environment, which Greek politicians, along with many economic
analysts, still fail to understand.
Before the
ECB’s decision, contagion from Greece
was a genuine threat. If the Greek government defaulted or tried to abandon the
euro, Greece ’s banks would
collapse, and Greeks who failed to get their money out of the country would
lose their savings, as occurred in Cyprus in 2013. When savers in
other indebted euro countries such as Portugal
and Spain observed this,
they would fear similar losses and move their money to banks in Germany or Austria , as well as sell their
holdings of Portuguese or Spanish government bonds.
As a
result, the debtor countries’ bond prices would collapse, interest rates would
soar, and banks would be threatened with collapse. If the contagion from Greece intensified, the next-weakest country,
probably Portugal ,
would find itself unable to support its banking system or pay its debts. In
extremis, it would abandon the euro, following the Greek example.
Before
January, this sequence of events was quite likely, but the ECB’s bond-buying
program put a firebreak at each point of the contagion process. If holders of
Portuguese bonds are alarmed by a future Greek default, the ECB will simply
increase its bond buying; with no limit to its buying power, it will easily
overwhelm any selling pressure.
If savers
in Portuguese banks start moving their money to Germany ,
the ECB will recycle these euros back to Portugal through interbank
deposits. Again, there is no limit to how much money the ECB can recycle,
provided Portuguese banks remain solvent – which they will, so long as the ECB
continues to buy Portuguese government bonds.
In short,
the ECB bond-buying program has transformed the ECB from a passive observer of
the euro crisis, paralyzed by the outdated legalistic constraints of the
Maastricht Treaty, into a proper lender of last resort. With powers to monetize
government debts similar to those exercised by the US Federal Reserve, the Bank
of Japan, and the Bank of England, the ECB can now guarantee the eurozone
against financial contagion.
Unfortunately
for Greece ,
this has been lost on the Tsipras government. Greek politicians who still see
the threat of financial contagion as their trump card should note the
coincidence of the Greek election and the ECB’s bond-buying program and draw
the obvious conclusion. The ECB’s new policy was designed to protect the euro
from the consequences of a Greek exit or default.
The latest
Greek negotiating strategy is to demand a ransom to desist threatening suicide.
Such blackmail might work for a suicide bomber. But Greece
is just holding a gun to its own head – and Europe
does not need to care very much if it pulls the trigger.
Read more
at
http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/greek-default-political-suicide-by-anatole-kaletsky-2015-06#PWJZ6U8YEFw00bGX.99
No comments:
Post a Comment