By DAVID JOLLYMAY 13, 2015
The New York Times
The
economies of Finland and Greece ,
however, contracted for a second straight quarter, meeting the technical
definition of a recession.
Over all,
the gross domestic product of the 19 nations that form the euro currency bloc
grew 0.4 percent in the period from January to March from the previous three
months, when it grew 0.3 percent, Eurostat, the statistical agency of the European
Union, reported from Luxembourg .
The
European Union, with 500 million consumers, is the world’s biggest mature
market and its biggest exporter. Better growth in the region would help to keep
the global economy expanding as worries arise about a slowdown in China and the United States .
The bloc’s
economy has been expanding since the first half of 2013. Economists credit the
happy combination of a weak euro, low oil prices and the European Central
Bank’s effort to drive down interest rates with aggressive monetary policy for
keeping the expansion alive.
Eurostat
said the eurozone’s first-quarter growth worked out to an annualized rate of
1.6 percent, sharply higher than the 0.2 percent annual growth the United States
produced in the same period.
The German
economy grew 0.3 percent at a quarterly pace, slowing from a 0.7 percent rate
in the last three months of last year and slightly disappointing market
expectations of a 0.5 percent increase. The biggest surprise came from France , where
first-quarter growth of 0.6 percent was the strongest in nearly two years and
well ahead of expectations of 0.4 percent after stagnating in the final quarter
of 2014.
Christian
Schulz, an economist at Berenberg Bank in London ,
pointed out in a research note that cheaper gasoline had helped French
consumers raise their spending by a strong 0.8 percent from the previous
quarter, while inventory buildup, a notorious contributor to data volatility,
also helped the quarterly showing.
Some of the
positive factors that lifted first-quarter growth will probably not be
repeated. Oil prices were about 30 percent lower in the first quarter than in
the final quarter of 2014, providing a stimulus to consumers, but have since
rallied.
The euro
was almost 10 percent weaker in the first quarter than in the previous three
months, a boon to European exporters. But the currency appears to have
stabilized around its current level of $1.12. And the European Central Bank’s
quantitative easing policy, under which it buys up to 60 billion euros, or $67
billion, of bonds each month to stave off deflationary pressures, is now built
into expectations.
“Strengthening
the European economic recovery requires further decisive policy efforts,”
Valdis Dombrovskis, the European Commission’s vice president with
responsibility for the euro, said at a news conference in Brussels . “Many member states face challenges
such as high public and private debt, low productivity and lack of investment,
which result in high unemployment and worsening social conditions.”
The
European Commission said on Wednesday that Finland faced possible disciplinary
action after it failed to hold its budget deficit below the 3 percent ceiling
under European Union rules. A so-called excessive deficit procedure, if the
commission were to open one, would put Finland in the same camp as Spain,
France and Greece, countries that the pro-austerity Finns have been known to
criticize for their fiscal laxity.
In Spain , one of
the eurozone countries hit hardest since the financial crisis, the economy
regained more lost ground, posting first-quarter quarterly growth of 0.9
percent. Italy
grew at a 0.3 percent quarterly rate, the first expansion recorded in the
country since the third quarter of 2013, when the economy grew 0.1 percent.
The picture
in Britain ,
which is not a member of the euro currency group, was similar to that of the
eurozone. The Office for National Statistics reported in late April that the
British economy grew at a quarterly rate of 0.3 percent in the January-to-March
period, disappointing market expectations. On Wednesday, the Bank of England
cut its 2015 growth forecast to 2.5 percent from 2.9 percent after that
worse-than-expected performance.
Correction:
May 13, 2015
An earlier
version of this article misstated part of a name of an action that the European
Commission could take against Finland .
It is a so-called excessive deficit procedure, not an excessive debt procedure.
No comments:
Post a Comment