By PETER
EAVIS, JACK EWING and LANDON THOMAS Jr.MAY 10,
2015
The New York Times
Greek
leaders have fought fiercely in recent months with politicians from other
European countries over relief on Greece ’s vast debt load.
Yet the
power to decide the fate of Greece
lies not just in the hands of these national governments, but also with
unelected officials at two powerful institutions: the European Central Bank and
the International Monetary Fund. Each is a creditor to Greece , and
each is expecting the country to repay it billions of dollars of debt in the
coming weeks.
The
influence of the E.C.B. and the I.M.F. will be felt behind the scenes on
Monday, when finance ministers from Greece and other European nations meet in
their latest effort to break an impasse that is paralyzing the Greek economy
and frightening global markets.
The
politicians at the meeting are racing against the clock to forge a deal that
would give Greece
enough money to repay both this summer.
In theory,
both institutions could greatly ease the situation by agreeing to delay
repayment, or even forgiving some of their Greek debt. But they see themselves
as a special class of creditors — so-called lenders of last resort — that
should not write off the money they lend.
Still, some
sovereign debt specialists say that there is a case for the monetary fund to
take a hit on its Greek loans. The institution, they assert, backed the
policies that deflated Greece ’s
economy, making it harder for Greece
to service its debt.
“There is
no question in my mind that the I.M.F. needs to be part of the debt
forgiveness,” said Ashoka Mody, a visiting professor at Princeton
and formerly a senior official at the fund. “At some point, you have to give up
this orthodoxy of saying, ‘This is the right way of doing things.’ This is an
unusual case.”
Debt
forgiveness from the central bank has even broader support from outside
investors and economists because the bank avoided taking a loss on €27 billion
worth of Greek bonds in its portfolio while private sector investors lost more
than half of their money in the 2012 Greek debt restructuring.
Still,
there has been no sign that either institution is considering yielding on its
payment schedule. If there are no concrete signs of progress in the talks
Monday, a majority of the central bank’s governing council would be in favor of
placing additional restrictions on lending to Greek banks as early as this
week, people briefed on the council’s discussions said.
“Their
interest is to get their money back,” said Zsolt Darvas, a senior fellow at
Bruegel, a research organization in Brussels .
Greek
officials, meanwhile, have contemplated steps that would test the institutions’
hard-line stance.
Discussions
in the Greek government have included assessing the pros and cons of not paying
the central bank and the monetary fund, said two people who were briefed on the
discussions but who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
In such a
case, which was described as a last-ditch option and not a plan for action, Greece would
keep paying debts owed to private sector bondholders and other European
governments.
Such
discussions may be part of an oft-criticized gamesmanship by the Greek
government since it came to power in January. It is entirely possible that an
agreement of some sort will be struck in the next few days or weeks, as
brinkmanship gives way to lasting compromise. Greece may even be able to scrape
together money to get partly through the summer by tapping cash pools at
various municipalities.
But a few
of the debt specialists advising Yanis Varoufakis, the Greek finance minister,
contend that they have a strong intellectual case for defaulting on debt owed
to the central bank and the monetary fund. For too long, they assert, Greece has been
stuck in a cycle of having to borrow more money to pay off maturing debts. And
each time it borrows more, it must accept economic austerity measures that
deflate its economy.
A result,
they argue, is that five years after Greece ’s first bailout, the
nation’s economy has contracted by a quarter, and its debt burden is
approaching 200 percent of its gross domestic product.
From the
day the notion was pitched a bit more than a month ago, it has been seen as an
approach to undertake only at the very end of the road. But as time has gone by
and the perception has grown in the government that Greece’s creditors will not
budge, the idea — radical and risky as it may be — has begun to take shape.
Still, no move toward such an option appears imminent.
While Mr.
Varoufakis has told Christine Lagarde, managing director of the monetary fund,
and Mario Draghi, the president of the central bank, how onerous these
obligations have become for Greece ,
he has not threatened to stop payment.
And not
everyone in Mr. Varoufakis’s brain trust embraces the approach. One senior
adviser who was not authorized to speak publicly said that while he was
supportive of a hard line with the central bank, defaulting on the monetary
fund loan risked lumping Greece
together with financial pariahs.
Some
outside analysts expressed the same sentiment.
“For a
country which has no access to the markets to not pay the I.M.F. — that just
does not seem like a way forward,” said Frank Gill, a Greece specialist at Standard & Poor’s in London .
It would of
course also be a high-stakes gamble for Greece
to do anything that could undermine relations with the central bank, which is
shoring up Greece ’s
banking system. It has lent Greek banks more than €110 billion, cash the
lenders need to operate but would have trouble raising on international money
markets.
The support
to the banks is not the debt that the officials in the Greek government would
consider for default. Instead, the idea would be to not repay Greek government
bonds held by the central bank. Greece
is scheduled to repay nearly €7 billion on those this summer.
If the
Greek banks could not repay their central bank loans, the losses would be
passed on to other eurozone countries. An outcry would come from Germany and other countries already fed up with
what they regard as Greece ’s
misbehavior. The central bank’s credibility — probably a central bank’s most
important asset — could be damaged.
Still, the
central bank’s deep caution about financial stability would most likely limit
how hard it pressed Greece .
As the guardian of the single currency, the central bank may not want to do
anything that could set off a chain of catastrophic events in Greece ’s
banking sector that could lead the country to quit the euro.
“The E.C.B.
does not want to be responsible for precipitating a crisis,” said Mujtaba
Rahman, practice head for the European Union at Eurasia Group, a political
consultancy. “They are very, very concerned about having blood on their hands.”
No comments:
Post a Comment