By Tim
Worstall, Contributor
MAY 24,
2015 @ 5:57 PM
Forbes
This isn’t
exactly the most surprising news we’re going to be told today but Greece
is announcing that it simply won’t be able to meet the upcoming repayments due
to the IMF in June. We’ve all known that at some point this moment would come:
without the unlocking of the final tranche of the earlier, seconed, bailout
there was no imaginable manner in which Greece could make all the payments
due over the summer. Not unless some miracle happened with tax revenues that
is, and as the country’s back in recession that’s not going to happen either.
However,
worth noting that this doesn’t actually mean default in June: things move
rather more slowly than that.
Here’s the
news itself:
Shut out of
bond markets and with bailout aid locked, cash-strapped Athens has been scraping state coffers to
meet debt obligations and to pay wages and pensions.
After four
months of talks with its euro zone partners and the IMF, the country’s
leftist-led government is still scrambling for a deal that could release up to
7.2 billion euros ($7.9 billion) in remaining aid to avert bankruptcy.
“The four
installments for the IMF in June are 1.6 billion euros ($1.8 billion). This
money will not be given and is not there to be given,” Interior Minister Nikos
Voutsis told Greek Mega TV’s weekend show.
As I say,
this isn’t actually all that much of a surprise. The only question in minds
recently has been when this would happen, not whether. Others have been saying
that the problem is more fine grained than that:
On
Thursday, a spokesman for the left-wing Syriza party said that Greece won’t be
able to pay the next tranche of 300 million euros to the IMF on June 5 unless
it receives extra financial aid from creditors.
“Now is the
moment that negotiations are coming to a head. Now is the moment of truth, on
June 5,” Nikos Filis, spokesman for Syriza party lawmakers, told ANT1 TV
channel. “If there is no deal by then that will address the current funding
problem, they won’t get any money.”
It’s not
just the 1.6 billion in June, it’s the 300 million the week after next. And
Varoufakis, the finance minister, has been pointing out:
Finance
minister Yanis Varoufakis said Greece
had made “enormous strides” at reaching a deal with its lenders to avert
bankruptcy, but it was now up to the institutions to do their bit.
“We have
met them three-quarters of the way, they need to meet us one-quarter of the
way,” he told BBC on Sunday.
Mr
Varoufakis also said it would be “catastrophic” if Greece left the Eurozone,
predicting it would be “the beginning of the end of the common currency
project”.
He said in
the last four months Athens
had managed to pay public sector salaries, pensions and dues to the IMF by
extracting 14 per cent of national output.
Well, those
public pensions and salaries aren’t really by “extracting” national output,
that’s just the regular cycle of taxation and spending. But yes, the repayments
of capital on the debt are extraction, but they’re also a lot smaller as a
percentage of GDP than that.
As I say,
we could all see the debt repayment schedules, we could all see that it
couldn’t last forever, and the only question was when the crunch came.
As to the
Eurogroup, the creditors, moving towards the Syriza position, there’s not
really mjch more they can do. They’ve already relaxed, or at least indicated
that they’re willing to relax, the target for a primary surplus this year and
next. The last two sticking points are about domestic Greek policy on wages
(both raising the minimum wage and hiring more governmernt employees) and labor
protections (how tough is it to fire someone?). And the creditors just aren’t
going to give ground on these. Because they regard them as essential to
allowing the Greek economy to grow in the future into being able to repay the
debt. To not insist on these would, by their understanding (whether that
understanding is right or wrong is another matter) be simply condemning
everyone to a default a little later on. So they’re just not going to agree.
Maybe Syriza has moved a lot: but whether that movement is enough depends upon
views of how extreme the original positions were. Too much so say the
creditors.
As to what
happens next a default to the IMF does not in fact count as a default
immediately. We might call it a default event, even a default-like event, not a
default. First, the IMF waits 30 days, then informs the Board that the money
hasn’t been received. At which point they’ve quite a lot of leeway. While this
isn’t formally what happens in reality: if they think that the country is
really trying to pay, has paid some of it, then no default is declared, some
shuffling of the problem out of the way happens. If they think that the debtor
is simply being recalcitrant, then default is declared, although no rich
country not in complete extremis has ever done so. What then happens is,
although it doesn’t absolutely have to, a triggering of the cross-default
clauses. You’re in default to your most senior creditor? And the IMF is your
most senior creditor, then you’re in default to them all.
So, even if
the IMF isn’t paid on June 5th it’s really July 5th and beyond that the
fireworks really start. By which point, of course, one side or the other might
have caved, the last tranche of the secnd bailout is delivered, the IMF paid
and on the circus goes. Or not, as the case may be.
No comments:
Post a Comment